Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scotland Explained's avatar

Encouraging to see the focus shift from waiting on one party to building durable civic capacity across the movement. The crucial test will be governance: transparent finance, accountable leadership, genuine autonomy for member groups and room for disagreement. If YES2030 embeds those principles from the start, it could begin building the civic infrastructure that statehood would require.

aName's avatar

"A plebiscitary election might establish a political mandate, but it would not itself transfer authority or secure recognition."

An electoral event could, as you agree, establish the political legitimacy.

We assert that the people of Scotland are sovereign.

That is non negotiable.

That is our ancient right bequeathed to us and preserved 'for all time' in our Scots constitution.

We have the authority and choose what instruction to legitimately give to our parliament.

And to the final securing recognition part- that begs the question: recognition from who?

If you mean the international community then you know that is being handled by representations from Liberation to the UN.

If you mean from the Scottish people, well we have recognised what we intend to do by voting for it in an electoral event.

If you mean the rump of the UK state, then I say to you that they have no say.

They can accept it, or huff and puff!

We are Sovereign, they are foreign and have no legitimate input.

I expect you will have been following the cases at the UN C24 like e.g. French Polynesia and New Caledonia.

The UN is absolutely clear that the colonising state has no legitimate influence in the pre separation deliberations.

It is for us to arrange and for the UK to accept the result that we decide.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?